Das einzigste Fazit, was man aus seiner Show ziehen kann: Craig Wright ist
ein Hochstapler.

Ein Hochstapler mit beachtlichen Leistungen und mehreren PhD's allerdings. Warum schrieb Jon Matonis "There won't be another Satoshi"? Er hatte wie Andresen und IanGrigg früh mit ihm zu tun und scheint nach wie vor überzeugt, dass er es ist.

Das Krypto-Genie Ian Grigg:

Let's get more topical. There are strident, demanding calls for people
who make statements concerning the identity of one said Satoshi Nakamoto
to back those statements up with cryptographic proof. Yet these demands
are .. unfounded, and that is the kindest thing that could be said about
them. Why?

Anyone offering information to the world has no necessary call to offer
more information. When I say that Craig Wright was the leader of the
team known as Satoshi Nakamoto, I do not contract to say more. Nor did
Gavin or Jon or others in any sense contract to say more than they did.

(...)

Firstly, Satoshi Nakamoto is not one human being. It is or was a team.
Craig Wright named one person in his recent communications, being the
late Dave Kleinman. Craig did not name others, nor should I. While he
was the quintessential genius who had the original idea for Bitcoin and
wrote the lion's share of the code, Craig could not have done it alone.
Satoshi Nakamoto was a team effort.

Indeed, a sort of proof is right there in front of you - when you look
at Craig Wright, you do not see Satoshi. When you look at Satoshi
Nakamoto, you're seeing some measure of the influence of Dave Kleinman,
and it isn't possible for Dave to prove anything anymore to anyone.
Team Satoshi is ephemeral, and no cryptographic multisig can now capture
those that aren't around any more.

This team effort was one of a most severe cost to all members of that
team, and only privacy is holding us back from recognising it.

Further, the keys that controlled critical parts were moved several
times between various persons. Which is to say that control of the keys
does not indicate more than the holder being trustworthy to the goals of
the team at a point in time. Even if Craig manages to sign over a coin,
it does not and cannot prove he is "the one," only that he was at one
point in time a trusted member of the team. Albeit, the team that he
founded, but a wise leader controls for all risks, including those risks
posed by the leader himself.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4i92l0/ian_grigg_on_twitter_csw_is_thinking_5yr_p...

http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2016-May/029323.html