*Sorry to say, the rule of law is not a wonderful thing. We have a stark choice whether we want democracy, or the rule of law. These two regimes are not identical, – they stand in direct opposition. In a democracy, the people rule via their elected representatives; under the rule of law, the judges rule supreme. Yes there is the Law, but the judges interpret it as they see fit. They may nullify a law, or reinterpret it in an entirely different vein.

This new tendency of using Law as a tool in politics is the gift of Jews to perplexed mankind. The Jews were traditionally ruled by sages, or judges. Theoretically, Talmudic sages interpreted the Law of Halacha, but actually the rule of Halacha was the rule by sages, and only the Enlightenment broke its iron grip. Jews were set free, but this freedom did not last long. As the world increasingly Judaises, the sages take over the decision-making all over the world.*

Ich werde jetzt nicht anfangen, herumzunörgeln und stattdessen darauf hinweisen, daß, was Shamir über die Herrschaft des Gesetzes schreibt, aufgrund gewisser ... ähemm ... Begleitumstände dem entspricht, was ich als Theokratie bezeichne.

*As for lawyers, the Americans would do well to roll their powers back. Perhaps, Denis Diderot was right and Man will never be free until the last lawyer is strangled with the entrails of the last banker.*

Richter und Staatsanwälte sollten vorher drankommen.

*As the world increasingly Judaises, the sages take over the decision-making all over the world.*

Wen meint er denn damit? Etwa die Weisen von Zion?

Das decision-making all over the world begann 1945/46 in Nürnberg, beim IMT.

Tempranillo

www.unz.com/ishamir/the-deep-state-vs-netanyahu-lawyers-and-statemen/

--
*Die Demokratie bildet die spanische Wand, hinter der sie ihre Ausbeutungsmethode verbergen, und in ihr finden sie das beste Verteidigungsmittel gegen eine etwaige Empörung des Volkes*, (Francis Delaisi).