Hello,

it would take years to struggle through all those various economic schools and their particular views on money (if existing at all)...
- Basic Classical and Neoclassical assumption of the barter doctrine by Adam Smith
- Labor theory of value by Karl Marx
- Quantity theory of money by Irving Fisher (et al) along with the monetaristic consideration of money supply
- The regression theorem and neutrality of money within the Austrian School
- Demurrage by negative interest rates
- so called full money

... eventually only to potentially come to the conclusion that without a legal framework there cannot exist money (better: credit relationships) and therefore no market - and this legal framework along with its corresponding tribute system under penalty of sanctions is imposed.

But one can only come to this conclusion if one gets rid of all the dogmas which were rammed into him and shines a light on the big picture or just does not lie any longer to himself (overcomming cognitive dissonance is a hard task, especially if one gets paid for particular sermons).

To understand, it takes a short historical survey regarding the development of the human population - relating to [link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number]Dunbar's number[/link] and the constantly changing nutritional conditions which improved radically through the Neolithic Revolution (along with the establishment of religious castes in order to allegedly avoid a new catastrophy and along with the development of writing and mathematics in order to logistically master the watering of fields, etc.) that the previous existing social control of human communities has been removed, plain and simple.

That means nothing else than that: the community shattered resp. expanded inevitably into a society and it came to oppression within this society in order to establish the formerly voluntarily solidaric redistribution with force.

This is the birth of the state when someone raised the weapon and demanded tribute. It is the birth of credit and the birth of markets where the tributary subject has to do one's utmost to generate the tribute - in which type however and by whatever means.

This is the natal hour of economy, money and presumably the downfall of mankind - the expulsion from Paradise.

This theory of power precedes every economic theories and forasmuch any so-called economic science is ignoring this basic component in its models and explanations it is not worth one iota than as mental enfeeblement where one wastes his lifetime in meaningless discussions about money, all of whom misses the point.

Regards!â„¢

Bonus: "tar - Revelation"

--
Gruß!™

Time is the school in which we learn,
Time is the fire in which we burn.

BTC: 12aiXGLhHJVETnmGTLbKtAzJNwqh6h6HN4