Nur dann, wenn die Nevada-Panama-Konstruktion "enttarnt" wird.
http://insideparadeplatz.ch/2016/04/05/schoene-putin-patin-und-ihre-swiss-connections/
"..This is just the tip of the iceberg. I would suspect that the Clinton’s might have some exposure here as well but time will tell. When Obama came to office, he and Hillary immediately pushed through Congress a free trade deal for Panama which enabled money laundering to move into high gear. Hillary is worth $45 million more than any other Republican hopeful except Trump. How has she earned so much yet working in government? All my sources have warned about the Clintons for years being available to the highest bidder. Hillary and Panama go much deeper. If you open a corporation in Nevada, you do not have to declare who is the actual owner. That company can then engage in Panama and such names will never show up in the leak. Hillary is notorious for such back door schemes just as donations to her money laundering charity were made to Canada as a front and then to USA to clean the money from foreign governments. She forgot to declare that one. The shady mining deal in Russia that resulted in her getting a few million is typical. Then there was her deal getting a mining contract in Hati for her brother while Secretary of State. She knows it creates a shit-storm, but for a week and everyone cheers her again..."
Daraus übersetzt:
Als Obama ins Amt kam, haben er und Hillary umgehend den "free trade deal" für Panama durch das Parlament gepuscht, der Geldwäsche im Turbogang möglich machte.......
..... Wenn man eine Firma in Nevada aufmacht, dann muß man nicht veröffentlichen, wer der Eigentümer ist. Diese Firma kann sich dann in Panama betätigen und solche Namen werden niemals in den "Leaks" auftauchen......
Noch Fragen, Kienzle?
--
For entertainment purposes only.